Chile vs Guam: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time
- Chile
- Guam
How they compare
Guam currently reports 77.3 0-100 against 76.72 0-100 in Chile, a difference of 0.58 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 38th and Guam ranks 35th of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Guam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Guam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.29 0-100 | 71.79 0-100 | 8.5 0-100 | Chile |
| 2010s | 77.79 0-100 | 73.89 0-100 | 3.9 0-100 | Chile |
| 2020s | 76.49 0-100 | 77.46 0-100 | 0.9717 0-100 | Guam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Chile or Guam?
- Guam, at 77.3 0-100 against 76.72 0-100 in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Chile and Guam?
- 0.58 0-100, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Guam?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Guam rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Chile ranks 38th and Guam ranks 35th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).