Central African Republic vs Ethiopia: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)

Central African Republic
34.47 0-100
in 2025
Ethiopia
34.31 0-100
in 2025
Central African Republic rank
174th
Ethiopia rank
175th

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Ethiopia
010203040199620102025

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 34.47 0-100 against 34.31 0-100 in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.16 0-100.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 174th and Ethiopia ranks 175th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 3 and Ethiopia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1990s 41.18 0-100 35.13 0-100 6.04 0-100 Central African Republic
2000s 39.07 0-100 35.19 0-100 3.89 0-100 Central African Republic
2010s 38.86 0-100 33.98 0-100 4.88 0-100 Central African Republic
2020s 35.52 0-100 36.68 0-100 1.16 0-100 Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Central African Republic or Ethiopia?
Central African Republic, at 34.47 0-100 against 34.31 0-100 in Ethiopia as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Central African Republic and Ethiopia?
0.16 0-100, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Ethiopia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Central African Republic and Ethiopia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
Central African Republic ranks 174th and Ethiopia ranks 175th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Ethiopia: Voice and Accountability - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/central-african-republic/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/central-african-republic/ethiopia/">Central African Republic vs Ethiopia: Voice and Accountability - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).