Cayman Islands vs Slovenia: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time
- Cayman Islands
- Slovenia
How they compare
Cayman Islands currently reports 78.16 0-100 against 77.83 0-100 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.33 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cayman Islands ahead.
Cayman Islands ranks 29th and Slovenia ranks 32nd of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cayman Islands averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cayman Islands | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 83.66 0-100 | 79.73 0-100 | 3.93 0-100 | Cayman Islands |
| 2000s | 74.21 0-100 | 76.31 0-100 | 2.1 0-100 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 69.35 0-100 | 74.75 0-100 | 5.4 0-100 | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 72.62 0-100 | 76.73 0-100 | 4.11 0-100 | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Cayman Islands or Slovenia?
- Cayman Islands, at 78.16 0-100 against 77.83 0-100 in Slovenia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Cayman Islands and Slovenia?
- 0.33 0-100, with Cayman Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Slovenia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Cayman Islands and Slovenia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Cayman Islands ranks 29th and Slovenia ranks 32nd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).