Cape Verde vs French Polynesia: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time
- Cape Verde
- French Polynesia
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 73.88 0-100 against 73.82 0-100 in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.06 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 48th and French Polynesia ranks 49th of 208 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 74.37 0-100 | 70.47 0-100 | 3.9 0-100 | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 73.44 0-100 | 73.05 0-100 | 0.3929 0-100 | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Cape Verde or French Polynesia?
- Cape Verde, at 73.88 0-100 against 73.82 0-100 in French Polynesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Cape Verde and French Polynesia?
- 0.06 0-100, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and French Polynesia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
- How do Cape Verde and French Polynesia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Cape Verde ranks 48th and French Polynesia ranks 49th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).