Burkina Faso vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time
- Burkina Faso
- Democratic Republic of Congo
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 35.63 0-100 against 35.62 0-100 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.01 0-100.
Across all 27 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 167th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 168th of 208 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Democratic Republic of Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 47.66 0-100 | 21.73 0-100 | 25.93 0-100 | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 51.98 0-100 | 30.97 0-100 | 21.01 0-100 | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 54.99 0-100 | 32.66 0-100 | 22.33 0-100 | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 46.47 0-100 | 36.06 0-100 | 10.42 0-100 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Burkina Faso or Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Burkina Faso, at 35.63 0-100 against 35.62 0-100 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Burkina Faso and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 0.01 0-100, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Burkina Faso and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 167th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 168th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).