Brunei vs Kazakhstan: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time
- Brunei
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Brunei currently reports 40.22 0-100 against 40.05 0-100 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.17 0-100.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Brunei ahead.
Brunei ranks 152nd and Kazakhstan ranks 153rd of 208 countries.
Brunei has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 39.06 0-100 | 38 0-100 | 1.06 0-100 | Brunei |
| 2000s | 41.87 0-100 | 40.83 0-100 | 1.04 0-100 | Brunei |
| 2010s | 43.61 0-100 | 40.88 0-100 | 2.73 0-100 | Brunei |
| 2020s | 40.26 0-100 | 40.14 0-100 | 0.1233 0-100 | Brunei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Brunei or Kazakhstan?
- Brunei, at 40.22 0-100 against 40.05 0-100 in Kazakhstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Brunei and Kazakhstan?
- 0.17 0-100, with Brunei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Kazakhstan?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Brunei and Kazakhstan rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Brunei ranks 152nd and Kazakhstan ranks 153rd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).