Brazil vs Solomon Islands: Voice and Accountability - Governance score
Voice and Accountability - Governance score over time
- Brazil
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 62.57 0-100 against 62.39 0-100 in Brazil, a difference of 0.18 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Brazil ranks 83rd and Solomon Islands ranks 82nd of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 61.61 0-100 | 65.99 0-100 | 4.39 0-100 | Solomon Islands |
| 2000s | 66.02 0-100 | 56.6 0-100 | 9.42 0-100 | Brazil |
| 2010s | 64.57 0-100 | 57.64 0-100 | 6.93 0-100 | Brazil |
| 2020s | 59.79 0-100 | 61.53 0-100 | 1.74 0-100 | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Brazil or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 62.57 0-100 against 62.39 0-100 in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Brazil and Solomon Islands?
- 0.18 0-100, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Solomon Islands?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Solomon Islands rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Brazil ranks 83rd and Solomon Islands ranks 82nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).