Brazil vs Montenegro: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)

Brazil
65.47 0-100
in 2025
Montenegro
65.03 0-100
in 2025
Brazil rank
78th
Montenegro rank
79th

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time

  • Brazil
  • Montenegro
020406080199620102025

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 65.47 0-100 against 65.03 0-100 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.44 0-100.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 78th and Montenegro ranks 79th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Montenegro in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Montenegro Difference Ahead
1990s 60.14 0-100 49.33 0-100 10.81 0-100 Brazil
2000s 67.93 0-100 56.76 0-100 11.17 0-100 Brazil
2010s 67.98 0-100 60.77 0-100 7.21 0-100 Brazil
2020s 62.84 0-100 63.46 0-100 0.6219 0-100 Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Brazil or Montenegro?
Brazil, at 65.47 0-100 against 65.03 0-100 in Montenegro as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Brazil and Montenegro?
0.44 0-100, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Montenegro?
26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2025.
How do Brazil and Montenegro rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
Brazil ranks 78th and Montenegro ranks 79th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Montenegro: Voice and Accountability - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/brazil/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/brazil/montenegro/">Brazil vs Montenegro: Voice and Accountability - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).