Singapore vs Suriname: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Singapore
0.0383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Suriname
0.0554 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Singapore rank
99th
Suriname rank
97th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Singapore
  • Suriname
00.20.40.6199620102024

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.0554 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Singapore, a difference of 0.0171 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.4 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Singapore ahead.

Singapore ranks 99th and Suriname ranks 97th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2923 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0574 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2349 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Singapore
2000s 0.0902 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4165 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3263 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Suriname
2010s 0.2645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2466 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0179 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Singapore
2020s 0.1147 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1039 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0109 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Singapore or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.0554 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Singapore as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Singapore and Suriname?
0.0171 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Suriname?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Singapore and Suriname rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Singapore ranks 99th and Suriname ranks 97th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Suriname: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/singapore/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/singapore/suriname/">Singapore vs Suriname: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.