Samoa vs Slovak Republic: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Samoa
0.8879 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Slovak Republic
0.9302 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Samoa rank
46th
Slovak Republic rank
43rd

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Samoa
  • Slovak Republic
00.250.50.751199620102024

How they compare

Slovak Republic currently reports 0.9302 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8879 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Samoa, a difference of 0.0423 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Samoa ahead.

Samoa ranks 46th and Slovak Republic ranks 43rd of 206 countries.

Slovak Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Samoa Slovak Republic Difference Ahead
1990s 0.6337 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.698 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0643 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovak Republic
2000s 0.646 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8974 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2514 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovak Republic
2010s 0.5105 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8971 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3866 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovak Republic
2020s 0.948 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.018 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovak Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Samoa or Slovak Republic?
Slovak Republic, at 0.9302 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8879 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Samoa as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Samoa and Slovak Republic?
0.0423 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Slovak Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Slovak Republic?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Samoa and Slovak Republic rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Samoa ranks 46th and Slovak Republic ranks 43rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Samoa vs Slovak Republic: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/samoa/slovak-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/samoa/slovak-republic/">Samoa vs Slovak Republic: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.