New Zealand vs Switzerland: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

New Zealand
1.69 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Switzerland
1.64 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
New Zealand rank
5th
Switzerland rank
8th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • New Zealand
  • Switzerland
00.511.52199620102024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 1.69 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.64 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Switzerland, a difference of 0.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Switzerland ahead.

New Zealand ranks 5th and Switzerland ranks 8th of 207 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Switzerland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Switzerland Difference Ahead
1990s 1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0618 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Switzerland
2000s 1.59 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0343 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Switzerland
2010s 1.76 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1092 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 New Zealand
2020s 1.73 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, New Zealand or Switzerland?
New Zealand, at 1.69 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.64 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Switzerland as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between New Zealand and Switzerland?
0.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Switzerland?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Switzerland rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
New Zealand ranks 5th and Switzerland ranks 8th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Switzerland: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/new-zealand/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/new-zealand/switzerland/">New Zealand vs Switzerland: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 5,285 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.