Nepal vs Singapore: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Nepal
-0.1682 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Singapore
-0.1726 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Nepal rank
115th
Singapore rank
116th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Nepal
  • Singapore
-1-0.75-0.5-0.250199620102025

How they compare

Nepal currently reports -0.1682 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1726 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Singapore, a difference of 0.0044 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Singapore ahead.

Nepal ranks 115th and Singapore ranks 116th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s -0.3619 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0451 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Singapore
2000s -0.6448 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4956 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Singapore
2010s -0.2885 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0228 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Singapore
2020s -0.0753 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1236 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0483 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Nepal or Singapore?
Nepal, at -0.1682 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1726 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Singapore as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Nepal and Singapore?
0.0044 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Singapore?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Nepal and Singapore rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Nepal ranks 115th and Singapore ranks 116th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Singapore: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/nepal/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/nepal/singapore/">Nepal vs Singapore: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.