Naoero vs Saint Lucia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Naoero
0.5991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Saint Lucia
0.6113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Naoero rank
62nd
Saint Lucia rank
60th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Naoero
  • Saint Lucia
0.40.60.811.2199620102024

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 0.6113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Naoero, a difference of 0.0122 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Saint Lucia ahead.

Naoero ranks 62nd and Saint Lucia ranks 60th of 206 countries.

Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Naoero Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0886 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Saint Lucia
2000s 0.9921 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1511 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Saint Lucia
2010s 0.8156 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9711 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1555 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Saint Lucia
2020s 0.4554 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0769 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Naoero or Saint Lucia?
Saint Lucia, at 0.6113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Naoero as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Naoero and Saint Lucia?
0.0122 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and Saint Lucia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Naoero and Saint Lucia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Naoero ranks 62nd and Saint Lucia ranks 60th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Naoero vs Saint Lucia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/naoero/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/naoero/st-lucia/">Naoero vs Saint Lucia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.