Naoero vs South Africa: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Naoero
0.5991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
South Africa
0.6073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Naoero rank
62nd
South Africa rank
61st

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Naoero
  • South Africa
00.250.50.751199620102024

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0.6073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Naoero, a difference of 0.0082 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Naoero ahead.

Naoero ranks 62nd and South Africa ranks 61st of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Naoero averaged higher in 3 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Naoero South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4894 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5097 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Naoero
2000s 0.9921 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6171 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.375 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Naoero
2010s 0.8156 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5531 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2625 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Naoero
2020s 0.4554 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5765 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1211 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Naoero or South Africa?
South Africa, at 0.6073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Naoero as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Naoero and South Africa?
0.0082 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Naoero and South Africa rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Naoero ranks 62nd and South Africa ranks 61st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Naoero vs South Africa: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/naoero/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/naoero/south-africa/">Naoero vs South Africa: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.