Mexico vs Philippines: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Mexico
- Philippines
How they compare
Mexico currently reports -0.3383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3554 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Philippines, a difference of 0.0171 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Philippines ahead.
Mexico ranks 121st and Philippines ranks 123rd of 207 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.0026 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0967 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Philippines |
| 2000s | 0.3215 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0586 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3801 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mexico |
| 2010s | 0.0397 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1184 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mexico |
| 2020s | -0.2192 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3408 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1217 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Mexico or Philippines?
- Mexico, at -0.3383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3554 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Philippines as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Mexico and Philippines?
- 0.0171 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Philippines?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Mexico and Philippines rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Mexico ranks 121st and Philippines ranks 123rd of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.