Mauritius vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Mauritius
0.6061 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.5788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Mauritius rank
65th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
67th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Mauritius
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.40.60.811.2199620102025

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.6061 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0273 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Mauritius ranks 65th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 67th of 208 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1990s 0.7844 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2237 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.8858 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.7777 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9043 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.4889 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5663 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0774 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Mauritius or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Mauritius, at 0.6061 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Mauritius and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0273 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Mauritius and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Mauritius ranks 65th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 67th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/mauritius/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/mauritius/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Mauritius vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.