Malta vs Micronesia (country): Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Malta
0.9216 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Micronesia (country)
0.9032 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Malta rank
44th
Micronesia (country) rank
45th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Malta
  • Micronesia (country)
00.511.5199620102024

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.9216 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9032 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.0184 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Micronesia (country) ahead.

Malta ranks 44th and Micronesia (country) ranks 45th of 206 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Micronesia (country) Difference Ahead
1990s 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0009 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malta
2000s 1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.964 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malta
2010s 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8738 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2962 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malta
2020s 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6927 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3222 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Malta or Micronesia (country)?
Malta, at 0.9216 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9032 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Micronesia (country) as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Malta and Micronesia (country)?
0.0184 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Micronesia (country)?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Malta and Micronesia (country) rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Malta ranks 44th and Micronesia (country) ranks 45th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Micronesia (country): Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/malta/micronesia-fed-sts/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/malta/micronesia-fed-sts/">Malta vs Micronesia (country): Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.