Kuwait vs Morocco: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Kuwait
- Morocco
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports -0.7183 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Morocco, a difference of 0.0084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Kuwait has been ahead every year.
Kuwait ranks 138th and Morocco ranks 141st of 206 countries.
Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.2801 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5571 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.277 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kuwait |
| 2000s | -0.2704 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6706 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4002 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kuwait |
| 2010s | -0.3919 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6241 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2322 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kuwait |
| 2020s | -0.5675 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1407 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Kuwait or Morocco?
- Kuwait, at -0.7183 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Morocco as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Kuwait and Morocco?
- 0.0084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Morocco?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Kuwait and Morocco rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Kuwait ranks 138th and Morocco ranks 141st of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.