Kuwait vs Mauritania: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Kuwait
-0.9191 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Mauritania
-0.9018 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Kuwait rank
151st
Mauritania rank
150th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Kuwait
  • Mauritania
-1.2-1-0.8-0.6-0.4199620102025

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports -0.9018 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.9191 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kuwait, a difference of 0.0173 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Kuwait ahead.

Kuwait ranks 151st and Mauritania ranks 150th of 208 countries.

Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait Mauritania Difference Ahead
1990s -0.4127 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9553 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5426 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kuwait
2000s -0.3899 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4411 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kuwait
2010s -0.5194 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8177 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2982 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kuwait
2020s -0.7001 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1445 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kuwait

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Kuwait or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at -0.9018 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.9191 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kuwait as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Kuwait and Mauritania?
0.0173 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Mauritania?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Kuwait and Mauritania rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Kuwait ranks 151st and Mauritania ranks 150th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kuwait vs Mauritania: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kuwait/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kuwait/mauritania/">Kuwait vs Mauritania: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.