South Korea vs Slovakia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

South Korea
0.8756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Slovakia
0.848 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
South Korea rank
50th
Slovakia rank
52nd

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • South Korea
  • Slovakia
0.40.60.81199620102025

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 0.8756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.848 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovakia, a difference of 0.0276 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Slovakia ahead.

South Korea ranks 50th and Slovakia ranks 52nd of 208 countries.

Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Slovakia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3566 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5226 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.166 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovakia
2000s 0.8084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8462 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovakia
2010s 0.8284 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8867 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0583 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovakia
2020s 0.8738 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9463 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0726 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovakia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, South Korea or Slovakia?
South Korea, at 0.8756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.848 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovakia as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between South Korea and Slovakia?
0.0276 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Slovakia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do South Korea and Slovakia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
South Korea ranks 50th and Slovakia ranks 52nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Korea vs Slovakia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/korea-rep/slovak-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/korea-rep/slovak-republic/">South Korea vs Slovakia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.