Korea, Democratic People's Republic of vs South Sudan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
-1.99 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
South Sudan
-1.89 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of rank
203rd
South Sudan rank
202nd

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
  • South Sudan
-2.2-2-1.8-1.6-1.4-1.2199620102024

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports -1.89 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.99 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of, a difference of 0.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2011 it was South Sudan ahead.

Korea, Democratic People's Republic of ranks 203rd and South Sudan ranks 202nd of 207 countries.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea, Democratic People's Republic of South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s -1.98 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3327 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 South Sudan
2020s -1.97 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.92 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0557 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at -1.89 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.99 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Korea, Democratic People's Republic of and South Sudan?
0.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea, Democratic People's Republic of and South Sudan?
14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
How do Korea, Democratic People's Republic of and South Sudan rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of ranks 203rd and South Sudan ranks 202nd of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Korea, Democratic People's Republic of vs South Sudan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/korea-dem-people-s-rep/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/korea-dem-people-s-rep/south-sudan/">Korea, Democratic People&#x27;s Republic of vs South Sudan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 5,285 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.