Jordan vs Morocco: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Jordan
- Morocco
How they compare
Morocco currently reports -0.692 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7457 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Jordan, a difference of 0.0537 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 142nd and Morocco ranks 140th of 208 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.5946 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4946 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Morocco |
| 2000s | -0.6269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6175 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0095 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Morocco |
| 2010s | -0.6841 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6133 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Morocco |
| 2020s | -0.7712 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6959 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0753 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Jordan or Morocco?
- Morocco, at -0.692 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7457 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Jordan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Jordan and Morocco?
- 0.0537 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Morocco?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Jordan and Morocco rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Jordan ranks 142nd and Morocco ranks 140th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.