Jamaica vs Vanuatu: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Jamaica
0.5947 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Vanuatu
0.5471 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Jamaica rank
66th
Vanuatu rank
69th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Jamaica
  • Vanuatu
00.20.40.60.8199620102025

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 0.5947 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5471 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.0476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Vanuatu's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Vanuatu ahead.

Jamaica ranks 66th and Vanuatu ranks 69th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 2 and Vanuatu in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Vanuatu Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4231 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4563 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0332 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Vanuatu
2000s 0.5722 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4408 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1314 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Jamaica
2010s 0.5769 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5063 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0706 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Jamaica
2020s 0.5705 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.651 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0804 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Vanuatu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Jamaica or Vanuatu?
Jamaica, at 0.5947 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5471 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Vanuatu as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Jamaica and Vanuatu?
0.0476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Vanuatu?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Jamaica and Vanuatu rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Jamaica ranks 66th and Vanuatu ranks 69th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Vanuatu: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/jamaica/vanuatu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/jamaica/vanuatu/">Jamaica vs Vanuatu: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.