Jamaica vs Mauritius: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Jamaica
0.5947 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Mauritius
0.6061 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Jamaica rank
66th
Mauritius rank
65th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Jamaica
  • Mauritius
00.20.40.60.81199620102025

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.6061 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5947 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Jamaica, a difference of 0.0114 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritius ahead.

Jamaica ranks 66th and Mauritius ranks 65th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4231 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7844 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3613 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius
2000s 0.5722 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8858 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3136 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius
2010s 0.5769 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7777 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2008 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius
2020s 0.5705 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4889 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0817 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Jamaica or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 0.6061 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5947 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Jamaica as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Jamaica and Mauritius?
0.0114 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Mauritius?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Jamaica and Mauritius rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Jamaica ranks 66th and Mauritius ranks 65th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Mauritius: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/jamaica/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/jamaica/mauritius/">Jamaica vs Mauritius: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.