Israel vs Namibia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Israel
- Namibia
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0.3902 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3735 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Namibia, a difference of 0.0167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 27 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 82nd and Namibia ranks 83rd of 208 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.447 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3175 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1295 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Israel |
| 2000s | 0.6734 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3763 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2971 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Israel |
| 2010s | 0.5833 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4124 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1709 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Israel |
| 2020s | 0.5393 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4317 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1077 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Israel or Namibia?
- Israel, at 0.3902 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3735 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Israel and Namibia?
- 0.0167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Namibia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Israel and Namibia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Israel ranks 82nd and Namibia ranks 83rd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.