Hungary vs Sri Lanka: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Hungary
-0.0357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Sri Lanka
0.0078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Hungary rank
107th
Sri Lanka rank
105th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Hungary
  • Sri Lanka
-0.500.51199620102025

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.0078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Hungary, a difference of 0.0435 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 107th and Sri Lanka ranks 105th of 208 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 0.8796 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3928 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hungary
2000s 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2701 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hungary
2010s 0.5077 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3917 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8995 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hungary
2020s 0.0688 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2284 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Hungary or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 0.0078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Hungary as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Hungary and Sri Lanka?
0.0435 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Sri Lanka?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Hungary and Sri Lanka rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Hungary ranks 107th and Sri Lanka ranks 105th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Sri Lanka: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/hungary/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/hungary/sri-lanka/">Hungary vs Sri Lanka: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.