Hungary vs Senegal: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Hungary
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 0.0161 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0277 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Hungary, a difference of 0.0438 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 103rd and Senegal ranks 101st of 206 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1605 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2000s | 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0116 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2010s | 0.5181 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5232 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2020s | 0.0435 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0198 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0237 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Hungary or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 0.0161 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0277 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Hungary as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Hungary and Senegal?
- 0.0438 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Senegal?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Hungary and Senegal rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Hungary ranks 103rd and Senegal ranks 101st of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.