Hungary vs Nepal: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Hungary
- Nepal
How they compare
Hungary currently reports -0.0277 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Nepal, a difference of 0.0321 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 103rd and Nepal ranks 104th of 206 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4403 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2000s | 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.656 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2010s | 0.5181 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3139 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.832 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2020s | 0.0435 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0975 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.141 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Hungary or Nepal?
- Hungary, at -0.0277 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Hungary and Nepal?
- 0.0321 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Nepal?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Hungary and Nepal rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Hungary ranks 103rd and Nepal ranks 104th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.