Hungary vs Liberia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Hungary
- Liberia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 0.0171 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Hungary, a difference of 0.0528 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 107th and Liberia ranks 104th of 208 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8796 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2000s | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5977 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2010s | 0.5077 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0899 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5976 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2020s | 0.0688 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0508 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Hungary or Liberia?
- Liberia, at 0.0171 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Hungary as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Hungary and Liberia?
- 0.0528 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Liberia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Hungary and Liberia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Hungary ranks 107th and Liberia ranks 104th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.