Honduras vs Tunisia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Honduras
- Tunisia
How they compare
Honduras currently reports -0.6535 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0302 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 135th and Tunisia ranks 136th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.5154 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5417 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Honduras |
| 2000s | -0.3676 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7802 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Honduras |
| 2010s | -0.6212 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0982 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tunisia |
| 2020s | -0.6861 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3121 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3739 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Honduras or Tunisia?
- Honduras, at -0.6535 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Honduras and Tunisia?
- 0.0302 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Tunisia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Honduras and Tunisia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Honduras ranks 135th and Tunisia ranks 136th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.