Honduras vs Lebanon: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Honduras
-0.5948 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Lebanon
-0.5935 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Honduras rank
136th
Lebanon rank
135th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Honduras
  • Lebanon
-0.6-0.4-0.2199620102025

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports -0.5935 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5948 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Honduras, a difference of 0.0013 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Honduras ahead.

Honduras ranks 136th and Lebanon ranks 135th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 3 and Lebanon in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Lebanon Difference Ahead
1990s -0.4176 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6128 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1952 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Honduras
2000s -0.2831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3833 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1001 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Honduras
2010s -0.4683 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3861 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0822 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Lebanon
2020s -0.5802 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6249 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0447 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Honduras or Lebanon?
Lebanon, at -0.5935 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5948 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Honduras as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Honduras and Lebanon?
0.0013 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Lebanon?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Honduras and Lebanon rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Honduras ranks 136th and Lebanon ranks 135th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs Lebanon: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/honduras/lebanon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/honduras/lebanon/">Honduras vs Lebanon: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.