Guyana vs Nepal: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Guyana
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports -0.0598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1074 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Guyana, a difference of 0.0476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 108th and Nepal ranks 105th of 207 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2139 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4403 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Guyana |
| 2000s | 0.1595 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.656 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8154 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Guyana |
| 2010s | -0.0116 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3139 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3023 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Guyana |
| 2020s | -0.0413 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0975 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0563 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Guyana or Nepal?
- Nepal, at -0.0598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1074 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Guyana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Guyana and Nepal?
- 0.0476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Nepal?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Guyana and Nepal rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Guyana ranks 108th and Nepal ranks 105th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.