Guam vs Slovenia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Guam
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Guam, a difference of 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Slovenia ahead.
Guam ranks 35th and Slovenia ranks 32nd of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guam averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.7667 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2346 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 0.881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.928 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0523 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Guam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Guam or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Guam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Guam and Slovenia?
- 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Slovenia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Guam and Slovenia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Guam ranks 35th and Slovenia ranks 32nd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.