Germany vs Netherlands: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Germany
1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Netherlands
1.59 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Germany rank
9th
Netherlands rank
8th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Germany
  • Netherlands
00.511.5199620102025

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 1.59 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Germany, a difference of 0.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Netherlands ahead.

Germany ranks 9th and Netherlands ranks 8th of 208 countries.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Netherlands Difference Ahead
1990s 1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2404 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Netherlands
2000s 1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Netherlands
2010s 1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1669 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Netherlands
2020s 1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.62 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0859 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Germany or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 1.59 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Germany as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Germany and Netherlands?
0.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Netherlands?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Germany and Netherlands rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Germany ranks 9th and Netherlands ranks 8th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Netherlands: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/germany/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/germany/netherlands/">Germany vs Netherlands: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.