Georgia vs Mexico: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Georgia
- Mexico
How they compare
Georgia currently reports -0.2535 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mexico, a difference of 0.0848 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mexico ahead.
Georgia ranks 117th and Mexico ranks 120th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Mexico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.6664 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0026 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6638 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mexico |
| 2000s | -0.2034 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3215 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5249 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mexico |
| 2010s | 0.1259 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0397 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0862 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Georgia |
| 2020s | -0.0513 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2192 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1679 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Georgia or Mexico?
- Georgia, at -0.2535 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mexico as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Georgia and Mexico?
- 0.0848 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Mexico?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Mexico rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Georgia ranks 117th and Mexico ranks 120th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.