Georgia vs Lesotho: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Georgia
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports -0.1551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2535 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Georgia, a difference of 0.0984 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Lesotho ahead.
Georgia ranks 117th and Lesotho ranks 114th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Lesotho in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.6664 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2906 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3758 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Lesotho |
| 2000s | -0.2034 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0071 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2105 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 0.1259 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1135 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2394 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Georgia |
| 2020s | -0.0513 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1675 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1162 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Georgia or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at -0.1551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2535 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Georgia and Lesotho?
- 0.0984 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Lesotho?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Lesotho rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Georgia ranks 117th and Lesotho ranks 114th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.