France vs Guam: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- France
- Guam
How they compare
Guam currently reports 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in France, a difference of 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was France ahead.
France ranks 27th and Guam ranks 26th of 206 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, France averaged higher in 2 and Guam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Guam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7907 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.599 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | France |
| 2010s | 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8898 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | France |
| 2020s | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0147 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Guam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, France or Guam?
- Guam, at 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in France as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between France and Guam?
- 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Guam?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do France and Guam rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- France ranks 27th and Guam ranks 26th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.