Fiji vs Solomon Islands: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Fiji
0.3316 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Solomon Islands
0.3267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Fiji rank
81st
Solomon Islands rank
82nd

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Fiji
  • Solomon Islands
-1-0.500.5199620102024

How they compare

Fiji currently reports 0.3316 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.0049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Fiji ranks 81st and Solomon Islands ranks 82nd of 206 countries.

Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0883 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Solomon Islands
2000s -0.2576 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0141 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2435 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Solomon Islands
2010s -0.5082 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0451 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5534 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Solomon Islands
2020s 0.1229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2673 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1444 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Fiji or Solomon Islands?
Fiji, at 0.3316 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Solomon Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Fiji and Solomon Islands?
0.0049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Fiji ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Solomon Islands?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Fiji and Solomon Islands rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Fiji ranks 81st and Solomon Islands ranks 82nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Fiji vs Solomon Islands: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/fiji/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/fiji/solomon-islands/">Fiji vs Solomon Islands: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.