Fiji vs Namibia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Fiji
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.3365 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3316 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Fiji, a difference of 0.0049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Fiji ranks 81st and Namibia ranks 80th of 206 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0883 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1594 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Namibia |
| 2000s | -0.2576 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3386 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5962 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Namibia |
| 2010s | -0.5082 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3666 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8748 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0.1229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3891 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2662 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Fiji or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0.3365 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3316 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Fiji as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Fiji and Namibia?
- 0.0049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Fiji and Namibia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Fiji ranks 81st and Namibia ranks 80th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.