Fiji vs Mauritius: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Fiji
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0.3689 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3316 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Fiji, a difference of 0.0373 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Fiji ranks 81st and Mauritius ranks 78th of 206 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0883 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.719 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | -0.2576 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | -0.5082 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7615 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0.1229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3735 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2507 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Fiji or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 0.3689 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3316 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Fiji as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Fiji and Mauritius?
- 0.0373 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Mauritius?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Fiji and Mauritius rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Fiji ranks 81st and Mauritius ranks 78th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.