Eswatini vs Palestine, State of: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Eswatini
-1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Palestine, State of
-1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Eswatini rank
182nd
Palestine, State of rank
181st

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Eswatini
  • Palestine, State of
-1.5-1.2-1-0.75-0.5-0.25199620102024

How they compare

Palestine, State of currently reports -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Eswatini, a difference of 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 182nd and Palestine, State of ranks 181st of 207 countries.

Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
1990s -1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8077 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4782 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Palestine, State of
2000s -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5986 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6528 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Palestine, State of
2010s -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8425 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4271 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Palestine, State of
2020s -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Palestine, State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Eswatini or Palestine, State of?
Palestine, State of, at -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Eswatini and Palestine, State of?
0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Palestine, State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Palestine, State of?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Palestine, State of rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Eswatini ranks 182nd and Palestine, State of ranks 181st of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Palestine, State of: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/eswatini/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/eswatini/west-bank-and-gaza/">Eswatini vs Palestine, State of: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 5,285 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.