Eswatini vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Eswatini
-1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Lao People's Democratic Republic
-1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Eswatini rank
181st
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
183rd

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Eswatini
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
-1.8-1.6-1.4-1.2-1199620102024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.

Eswatini ranks 181st and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 183rd of 206 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
1990s -1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Eswatini
2000s -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2571 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Eswatini
2010s -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1227 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Eswatini
2020s -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1308 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Eswatini or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Eswatini, at -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Eswatini and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
0.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Eswatini ranks 181st and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 183rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/eswatini/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/eswatini/lao-pdr/">Eswatini vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.