El Salvador vs Morocco: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

El Salvador
-0.7479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Morocco
-0.692 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
El Salvador rank
143rd
Morocco rank
140th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • El Salvador
  • Morocco
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2-00.2199620102025

How they compare

Morocco currently reports -0.692 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0559 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 143rd and Morocco ranks 140th of 208 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Morocco Difference Ahead
1990s -0.3322 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4946 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1624 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2000s -0.0265 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6175 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.591 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2010s 0.0853 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6133 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6986 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2020s -0.441 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6959 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, El Salvador or Morocco?
Morocco, at -0.692 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in El Salvador as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between El Salvador and Morocco?
0.0559 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Morocco?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do El Salvador and Morocco rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
El Salvador ranks 143rd and Morocco ranks 140th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Morocco: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/el-salvador/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/el-salvador/morocco/">El Salvador vs Morocco: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.