El Salvador vs Lebanon: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

El Salvador
-0.7884 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Lebanon
-0.7733 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
El Salvador rank
144th
Lebanon rank
142nd

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • El Salvador
  • Lebanon
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2-0199620102024

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports -0.7733 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7884 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0151 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 144th and Lebanon ranks 142nd of 206 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Lebanon Difference Ahead
1990s -0.4232 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2996 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2000s -0.0519 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4768 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4249 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2010s -0.0472 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4825 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2020s -0.4851 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7521 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2669 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, El Salvador or Lebanon?
Lebanon, at -0.7733 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7884 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in El Salvador as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between El Salvador and Lebanon?
0.0151 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Lebanon?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do El Salvador and Lebanon rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
El Salvador ranks 144th and Lebanon ranks 142nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Lebanon: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/el-salvador/lebanon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/el-salvador/lebanon/">El Salvador vs Lebanon: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.