El Salvador vs Jordan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- El Salvador
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports -0.7457 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 143rd and Jordan ranks 142nd of 208 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.3322 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5946 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2624 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | El Salvador |
| 2000s | -0.0265 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6005 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 0.0853 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6841 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7694 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | El Salvador |
| 2020s | -0.441 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7712 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3303 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, El Salvador or Jordan?
- Jordan, at -0.7457 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in El Salvador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between El Salvador and Jordan?
- 0.0022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Jordan?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do El Salvador and Jordan rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- El Salvador ranks 143rd and Jordan ranks 142nd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.