Dominica vs Mauritius: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Dominica
0.3798 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Mauritius
0.3689 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Dominica rank
75th
Mauritius rank
78th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Dominica
  • Mauritius
0.20.40.60.81199620102024

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 0.3798 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3689 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0109 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Dominica ahead.

Dominica ranks 75th and Mauritius ranks 78th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Dominica
2000s 0.9741 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Dominica
2010s 0.7094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7615 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0521 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius
2020s 0.3328 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3735 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0408 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Dominica or Mauritius?
Dominica, at 0.3798 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3689 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritius as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Dominica and Mauritius?
0.0109 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Mauritius?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Dominica and Mauritius rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Dominica ranks 75th and Mauritius ranks 78th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs Mauritius: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/dominica/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/dominica/mauritius/">Dominica vs Mauritius: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.