Dominica vs Grenada: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Dominica
0.5003 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Grenada
0.4831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Dominica rank
72nd
Grenada rank
73rd

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Dominica
  • Grenada
0.40.60.81199620102025

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 0.5003 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Grenada, a difference of 0.0172 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Dominica ahead.

Dominica ranks 72nd and Grenada ranks 73rd of 208 countries.

Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Grenada Difference Ahead
1990s 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3669 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Dominica
2000s 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7878 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2246 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Dominica
2010s 0.7966 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7109 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0857 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Dominica
2020s 0.4571 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4329 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0242 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Dominica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Dominica or Grenada?
Dominica, at 0.5003 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Grenada as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Dominica and Grenada?
0.0172 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Grenada?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Dominica and Grenada rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Dominica ranks 72nd and Grenada ranks 73rd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs Grenada: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/dominica/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/dominica/grenada/">Dominica vs Grenada: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.