Cyprus vs South Korea: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Cyprus
0.8997 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
South Korea
0.8756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Cyprus rank
47th
South Korea rank
50th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Cyprus
  • South Korea
0.40.60.811.2199620102025

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 0.8997 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in South Korea, a difference of 0.0241 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cyprus ahead.

Cyprus ranks 47th and South Korea ranks 50th of 208 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus South Korea Difference Ahead
1990s 0.8706 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3566 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5141 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cyprus
2000s 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2433 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cyprus
2010s 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8284 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2395 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cyprus
2020s 0.9394 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8738 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0657 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Cyprus or South Korea?
Cyprus, at 0.8997 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in South Korea as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Cyprus and South Korea?
0.0241 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and South Korea?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Cyprus and South Korea rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Cyprus ranks 47th and South Korea ranks 50th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs South Korea: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cyprus/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cyprus/korea-rep/">Cyprus vs South Korea: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.