Cyprus vs French Polynesia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Cyprus
- French Polynesia
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 0.8873 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8766 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.0107 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.
Cyprus ranks 47th and French Polynesia ranks 49th of 206 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4985 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5956 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 0.9287 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8025 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1262 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Cyprus or French Polynesia?
- Cyprus, at 0.8873 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8766 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in French Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Cyprus and French Polynesia?
- 0.0107 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and French Polynesia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Cyprus and French Polynesia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Cyprus ranks 47th and French Polynesia ranks 49th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.