Cyprus vs French Polynesia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Cyprus
- French Polynesia
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 0.8997 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8772 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.0225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.
Cyprus ranks 47th and French Polynesia ranks 49th of 208 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6944 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3889 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 0.9394 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8352 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1042 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Cyprus or French Polynesia?
- Cyprus, at 0.8997 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8772 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in French Polynesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Cyprus and French Polynesia?
- 0.0225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and French Polynesia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
- How do Cyprus and French Polynesia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Cyprus ranks 47th and French Polynesia ranks 49th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.