Croatia vs United States Virgin Islands: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Croatia
0.7384 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
United States Virgin Islands
0.8093 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2017
Croatia rank
57th
United States Virgin Islands rank
54th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Croatia
  • United States Virgin Islands
-0.500.51199620102025

How they compare

United States Virgin Islands currently reports 0.8093 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.7384 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Croatia, a difference of 0.0709 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes United States Virgin Islands's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 57th and United States Virgin Islands ranks 54th of 208 countries.

United States Virgin Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia United States Virgin Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 0.6286 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7872 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1586 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 United States Virgin Islands
2010s 0.5641 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8123 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2482 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 United States Virgin Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Croatia or United States Virgin Islands?
United States Virgin Islands, at 0.8093 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.7384 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Croatia as of 2017.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Croatia and United States Virgin Islands?
0.0709 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with United States Virgin Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and United States Virgin Islands?
14 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2017.
How do Croatia and United States Virgin Islands rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Croatia ranks 57th and United States Virgin Islands ranks 54th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs United States Virgin Islands: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/croatia/virgin-islands-u-s/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/croatia/virgin-islands-u-s/">Croatia vs United States Virgin Islands: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.